Unexpected

"The greatest and most ancient of Greek philosophies is that of Crete and Sparta, and it is there that most of the earth's sophists reside..." Calasso pg. 248

This passage from Calasso surprised me when i read it teachers of philosophy in Sparta. It has always been my opinion that Sparta was the manliest of manly places ever in existence. So you can imagine just how surprised i was. This passage directly relates my feelings about literature classes at least my opinion of the before this class. I am a Cell Biology and Neuroscience major and take stock in facts and generally ignore other things. However as i have been told many times before (mostly by my mother) there are other things in life besides facts and proof. Through mythology i feel as though these other things are more accessible. You might be asking why mythology well its because its all one big story and i have been an insatiable reader since grade school. I love stories love the feeling of loosing my self in the lives of the characters. After this class i realize that everyday life is just another story and now i know the outcome of the story its like knowing the ending before you read it and it grants you a sense of power that is awesome. The ancient Spartans must have realized this as well because why else would this warrior society pursue knowledge. The answer is knowledge is power.

Mermaids

"But how did it all begin?" Calasso

While i would never dream of telling someone that they are completely wrong i feel obligated to shed some scientific light on the subject of mermaids in today's society. This rare natural phenomenon is called Sirenomelia and is a disorder that occurs during the gestation of any mammal. This disorder is extremely fatal in fact there is a 50% chance of being stillborn and those that do survive birth usually die within weeks. It is extremely rare for this to occur in fact only 1 out of 100,000 infants have this disorder. There are currently only 6 people alive in the world that have this disease.

I am relatively sure that this was given as a funny example of myth in today's society but just in case some people in class took it seriously thought that i would clear up a few facts.

In regards to my quote from Calasso I am wondering how people came up with some of their topics for this paper and in all actuality i am rather jealous that i did not think of them. For example Jills presentation on the trial that Nicholas goes through as the path to hell. I did not even think about this as i was reading the Magus, and Derril's paper on relating the path of Nicholas to that of multiple hero's wish i would have thought of that one.


 

Perfection

It is the idea of perfection. What is perfect is its own origin and does not wish to dwell on how it came into being. Calasso pg.90

In this passage Calasso is hinting at the Greeks and the gods want/need of perfection. This was interesting because in today's society our Gods are portrayed as the epitome in all of their characteristics. This leads me to wonder when did we as a human race change our criteria of Gods and why? Did the ancient Greeks make their gods into imperfect beings so that they could get away with more. My thoughts are aline with if the gods did it then why can't we do it. was that their reasoning? Or was it their own need of finding perfection that lead them to create gods that were searching for the same thing in other words to put themselves on the same level as the Gods. Unfortunatly we will never know why they created imperfect gods.


 As for why in today's society we made our Gods perfect I think it has to do with our inherent laziness. If our Gods are perfect then we have an excuse to not be perfect. This could be the origin of the classic i am only human excuse. This excuse is the eppitamy of people looking for an excuse of sub standard work.

All in all i think we would have benefited more form the old view of Gods. Personally i would rather have a society striving for perfection than a lazy sub standard society.

Relationships Make the Story

John Fowles’s novel The Magus is an enthralling book that grabs a hold of the reader and will simply not let go. There are several reasons for this books ability to captivate its readers; the main reason is its strong relation to mythology.  Just as in mythology the reason that this novel is so compelling is the complexity of the relationships that the characters have with one another. The Magus would not have been compelling to read if you as a reader could not associate with at least one of the characters. It is the same for mythology if you could not relate with the gods or heroes then the myths would be dull. In this novel Nicholas Urfe has three main relationships that send him through an emotional rollercoaster.

            The first of these relationships is subsequently the most emotionally taxing and ultimately frustrating. This is the relationship with Alison a young women who represents nothing more to Nicholas than a physical attraction at first. This relationship quickly advances as it always inevitably does and Alison rejects Nicholas. If it was not for this rejection this novel could have turned out completely different in fact Nicholas might have simply seen the God Game for what it was. Instead he is sucked into the game and continues this game to try and get Alison out of his mind. Playing the God Game is his way of trying to purge the idea of Alison from his mind. The relationship between Alison and Nicholas continues near the end of the book when she comes to see him on the island. It is during this visit that Nicholas turns down her unconditional love for a chance at a relationship with Julie. This was arguably the worst decision that he makes during the entire novel. This essentially marks the end of the relationship between the two until the end of the book when he realizes his mistake and tries to get Alison back.

            This relationship is almost exactly the same as Cupid and Psyche. In this story Alison would be Cupid and Nicholas would be Psyche. Nicholas does not know what he has until it is gone and then he chases after it with no success until that is Alison decides to see him. The only difference in this myth and the relationship between Nicholas and Alison is the ending in the myth they live happily ever after and in the novel the ending is a mystery to the reader.

            The second relationship that Nicholas has in this novel is with Julie. This relationship was probably the most confusing relationship in the novel due to all of the layers of the relationship. This relationship is noticeable because of the metamorphosis of Julie.  Throughout the novel she changes roles in the God Game multiple times. Even though she changed her role in deceiving Nicholas he seemed to be completely oblivious to her changes. Her first role in their relationship was the innocent mentally deranged young woman. This role appealed to Nicholas because he thought that he could outwit Conchis in his God Game. This shows us what kind of person Nicholas is during the majority of the novel a selfish man who uses people to make him feel better. Then later when Julie changed to the emotionally vulnerable young women. Nicholas uses Julie in this role to make himself feel better about Alison leaving him. Then Julie makes one last transformation and crushes all of Nicholas’s hopes at true love with her. This was supposedly done to teach Nicholas a lesson and to deter him from continuing his womanizing ways.

            This relationship can be related to that of Persephone and Hades. There are multiple references to Persephone in the novel she makes multiple references of running away from the situation in addition to that she is abducted while with Nicholas. The first and the most obvious reference to Persephone is the book that is left open on the beach. The book was open and the poem read, “First must thou go the road to hell And the bower of Ceres’ daughter Persephone” (Fowles 69). Nicholas who just wants Julie for his own selfish purposes represents Hades. Hades only abducts Persephone to feel better about himself not because he loves her. This relationship was set up as part of the God Game and was meant to teach Nicholas a lesson. While this seems a brutal lesson Nicholas is given plenty of warnings the greatest of these was the two clues he was given after Julie was abducted. “One was a doll. The other was a human skull… The doll was Julie, and said that she was evil, she was black, under the white innocence she wore.” (459).

            The third relationship the Nicholas had was with Conchis the master puppeteer behind the God Game. This relationship was one of frustration for both Nicholas and the reader. Conchis is a very subtle character seeming to leave every decision up to Nicholas, however he was so understanding that he could manipulate Nicholas and steer his decisions in the direction he wanted. This was evident when Conchis continuously warns Nicholas about Julie, “She may appear normal tomorrow. You must not let that deceive you.” (312).

            In this novel Conchis represents two different mythological characters Apate and Zeus.  The Greek goddess Apate was the goddess of fraud and deception. Conchis fits this description perfectly as the instigator of the God Game he is the focal point of the deception. He represents Zeus in a more subtle way pulling the puppeteer strings from the shadows. Zeus often in mythology plays other gods and mortals against each, however he rarely gets his hands dirty (unless of course it involves a woman) preferring to use others to reach his goal.  

            While there were other relationships that were portrayed in this novel and each one added depth to the story these were the relationships that most people could relate their own lives to. John Fowles uses relationships to not only captivate his readers but to imbed the story and its lessons into the reader’s minds.